<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dw="https://www.dreamwidth.org">
  <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2009-05-20:370814</id>
  <title>Brent "Chip" Edwars</title>
  <subtitle>Brent "Chip" Edwars</subtitle>
  <author>
    <name>Brent "Chip" Edwars</name>
  </author>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chipuni.dreamwidth.org/"/>
  <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://chipuni.dreamwidth.org/data/atom"/>
  <updated>2010-05-10T13:21:59Z</updated>
  <dw:journal username="chipuni" type="personal"/>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2009-05-20:370814:549</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chipuni.dreamwidth.org/549.html"/>
    <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://chipuni.dreamwidth.org/data/atom/?itemid=549"/>
    <title>Tea Partiers, anti-Tea Partiers, and race...</title>
    <published>2010-05-10T11:31:35Z</published>
    <updated>2010-05-10T13:21:59Z</updated>
    <dw:security>public</dw:security>
    <dw:reply-count>0</dw:reply-count>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;a title="Tea Partiers and Race" href="http://depts.washington.edu/uwiser/racepolitics.html" target="_blank"&gt;2010 Multi-state Survey on Race &amp;amp; Politics&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;From February 8 through March 15, 2010, WISER (the University of Washington Institute for the Study of Ethnicity, Race, and Sexuality) contacted people in seven states.  They asked them about whether they "strongly approved", "somewhat approved", "somewhat disapproved", or "strongly disapproved" of the tea party.  Then they asked other questions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;One set of questions is whether people of a given ethnic group are "hard-working", "intelligent", or "trustworthy".  The results put a lower bound on the percentage of people who believe that those attributes correlate with race.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Among Whites who "strongly approve" of the tea party, &lt;br /&gt;&lt;table style="WIDTH: 100%" border="1" cellspacing="2" bordercolor="#000000" cellpadding="1"&gt;&lt;tbody&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt; Blacks&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;Latinos &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt; Asians&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt; Whites&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Difference&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt; Hard-Working&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt; 35%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt; 54%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt; 56%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt; 49%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;strong&gt;21%&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt; Intelligent&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt; 45%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt; 44%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt; 62%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt; 59%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;strong&gt;18%&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt; Trustworthy&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt; 41%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt; 42%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt; 53%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt; 49%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;strong&gt;12%&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/p&gt;We know at least 21% of these White tea-partiers believe that Blacks are not hard-working, but that Asians are.  (We don't know the correlation.  It might be that 44% of tea partiers think that NO group is hard-working.  It might be that the 35% who think Blacks are hard-working think that all the others are not hard-working.  The only thing we can say from the data is that at least 21% of the results changed depending on race.)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We can do the same analysis among the polar-opposite group.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Among Whites who "strongly oppose" the tea party,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;table style="WIDTH: 100%" border="1" cellspacing="2" bordercolor="#000000" cellpadding="1"&gt;&lt;tbody&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt; Blacks&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt; Latinos&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt; Asians&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt; Whites&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Difference&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt; Hard-Working&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt; 55%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt; 58%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt; 71%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt; 56%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt; &lt;strong&gt;16%&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt; Intelligent&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt; 59%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt; 56%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt; 65%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt; 69%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt; &lt;strong&gt;13%&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt; Trustworthy&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt; 57%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt; 56%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt; 70%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt; 72%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt; &lt;strong&gt;16%&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We know that at least 16% of Whites who strongly oppose the tea party believe that Blacks are not hard-working, but that Asians are.  (Exactly the same caveats apply.)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Because both groups are White, we can also measure how differently the supporters and opponents see the other races: Take the difference between how they see Whites and how they see others.  For example, among the strong supporters of the Tea Party, 56% consider Asians to be hard-working, but 49% consider Whites to be hard-working.  Therefore, the difference is +7%.  Remember that this table only measures a minimum difference.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Among the strong supporters of the Tea Party:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;table style="WIDTH: 100%" border="1" cellspacing="2" bordercolor="#000000" cellpadding="1"&gt;&lt;tbody&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt; Blacks&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt; Latinos&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt; Asians&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt; Hard-Working&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt; -14%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt; +5%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt; +7%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt; Intelligent&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt; -14%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt; -15%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt; +3%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt; Trustworthy&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt; -8%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt; -7%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt; +4%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Average of the absolute values: 8.5556%&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Among the strong opponents of the Tea Party:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;table style="WIDTH: 100%" border="1" cellspacing="2" bordercolor="#000000" cellpadding="1"&gt;&lt;tbody&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt; Blacks&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt; Latinos&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt; Asians&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt; Hard-Working&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt; -1%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt; +2%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt; +15%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt; Intelligent&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt; -10%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt; -13%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt; -4%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt; Trustworthy&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt; -15%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt; -16%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt; +4%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Average of the absolute values: 8.8889%&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In this data, the difference between White tea partiers and Whites who strongly oppose the tea party seems to be as much about cynicism as about race.  Whites who strongly oppose the tea party are more likely to consider anyone -- no matter the race -- more hard-working, intelligent, and trustworthy than Whites who strongly support the tea party.  When you look at how much each group sees "the other" as different, they disagree on how the other is different, but they are similar on how much the other is different.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On the other hand, the same source gives plenty of differences between the tea partiers and their opponents.  Here's where they disagree by more than 40%:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;table style="WIDTH: 100%" border="1" cellspacing="2" bordercolor="#000000" cellpadding="1"&gt;&lt;tbody&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt; Tea Party Supporters&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt; Tea Party Opponents&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Generations of slavery and&lt;br /&gt;discrimination have created&lt;br /&gt;conditions that make it difficult&lt;br /&gt;for Blacks to work their way out&lt;br /&gt;of the lower class (% Disagree)&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p align="center"&gt; 72%&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p align="center"&gt; 28%&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;It's really a matter of some&lt;br /&gt;people not trying hard enough; if&lt;br /&gt;Blacks would only try harder they&lt;br /&gt;could be just as well off as Whites.&lt;br /&gt;(% Agree)&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p align="center"&gt; 73%&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p align="center"&gt; 33%&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt; Gay or lesbian couples should be&lt;br /&gt;allowed to legally adopt children.&lt;br /&gt;(% Agree)&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p align="center"&gt; 36%&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p align="center"&gt; 80%&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;strong&gt;We don't give everyone an&lt;br /&gt;equal chance in this country.&lt;br /&gt;(% Agree)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p align="center"&gt; &lt;strong&gt;23%&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p align="center"&gt;&lt;strong&gt; 72%&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt; If people were treated more&lt;br /&gt;equally, we'd have many &lt;br /&gt;fewer problems in this &lt;br /&gt;country.  (% Agree)&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p align="center"&gt; 31%&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p align="center"&gt; 77%&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt; President Obama is "Knowledgeable".&lt;br /&gt;(% Agree)&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p align="center"&gt; 38%&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p align="center"&gt; 79%&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt; President Obama is "Moral".&lt;br /&gt;(% Agree)&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p align="center"&gt; 32%&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p align="center"&gt; 86%&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I've bolded what I consider the most important question.  Tea Party supporters believe that we already give everyone an equal chance.  Tea Party &lt;br /&gt;opponents don't.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What do you think?  Take care, all.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Source: &lt;a href="http://depts.washington.edu/uwiser/Stereotypes%20about%20Asians%20and%20whites%20by%20White%20tea%20Party%20Approval.pdf"&gt;http://depts.washington.edu/uwiser/Stereotypes%20about%20Asians%20and%20whites%20by%20White%20tea%20Party%20Approval.pdf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Source:&lt;u&gt;&lt;font color="#0000ff"&gt; &lt;a href="http://depts.washington.edu/uwiser/Stereotypes%20of%20Asians%20and%20Whites%20by%20White%20tea%20Party%20Approvval.pdf"&gt;http://depts.washington.edu/uwiser/Stereotypes%20of%20Asians%20and%20Whites%20by%20White%20tea%20Party%20Approvval.pdf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/u&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Source: &lt;a href="http://depts.washington.edu/uwiser/Tea%20Party%20Chart%20[pdf]-1.pdf"&gt;http://depts.washington.edu/uwiser/Tea%20Party%20Chart%20[pdf]-1.pdf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Source: &lt;a href="http://depts.washington.edu/uwiser/mssrp_table.pdf"&gt;http://depts.washington.edu/uwiser/mssrp_table.pdf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=chipuni&amp;ditemid=549" width="30" height="12" alt="comment count unavailable" style="vertical-align: middle;"/&gt; comments</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2009-05-20:370814:298</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chipuni.dreamwidth.org/298.html"/>
    <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://chipuni.dreamwidth.org/data/atom/?itemid=298"/>
    <title>Hello!</title>
    <published>2009-05-20T16:07:23Z</published>
    <updated>2009-05-20T16:07:23Z</updated>
    <dw:security>public</dw:security>
    <dw:reply-count>0</dw:reply-count>
    <content type="html">Coming here from &lt;a href="http://chipuni.livejournal.com"&gt;LiveJournal&lt;/a&gt;, in order to see what's new and different here.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Greetings!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=chipuni&amp;ditemid=298" width="30" height="12" alt="comment count unavailable" style="vertical-align: middle;"/&gt; comments</content>
  </entry>
</feed>
